Legal Opinion

Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Calspan Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 8, 1978No. Appeal No. 78-501PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“board”)1 denying appellant’s petition2 to cancel appellee’s registration3 of FINDER as a trademark for electro-optical computer equipment (card movers, scanners, pre-processors, control units, and parts therefor) for sensing, detecting, and locating minute features in fingerprint images. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

FINDER is an acronym derived from FINgerprint DEscription Reader, the name given an automated fingerprint identification system manufactured under a government-sponsored…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Massey Junior College, Inc. v. Fashion Institute of TechnologyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. W. D. Byron & Sons, Inc. v. Stein Bros. Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. The Community of Roquefort v. Joseph B. Santo, Dba the Sign of the DoveCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Zazu Designs, a Partnership v. L'oreal, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. The H. Marvin Ginn Corporation v. The International Association of Fire Chiefs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Cerveceria Centroamericana, S.A. v. Cerveceria India, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. Dan Robbins & Associates v. Questor Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. Timex Corp. v. StollerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API