Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lites

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 14, 2006No. 05-P-1119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.

A Superior Court judge concluded that the fresh odor of burnt marijuana emanating from the open door of a stopped automobile was a sufficient basis upon which to arrest the defendant, a passenger in the vehicle, and that subsequent interrogation of the defendant in violation of his Miranda rights did not require suppression of physical evidence found on the defendant’s person because the items would inevitably have been discovered.1 The defendant was thereafter convicted by a Superior Court jury of possession of a class D controlled substance (marijuana) in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 342;…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HeathMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. Rosado-PerezMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API