Matter of Kucharuk v. . McQueen
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 17, 1917, affirming an award of the state industrial commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s husband was employed generally by Mr. Frank A. Fonda, who did work for the Saratoga County Sanitarium in grading and digging of- ditches.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 17, 1917, affirming an award of the state industrial commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s husband was employed generally by Mr. Frank A. Fonda, who did work for the Saratoga County Sanitarium in grading and digging of- ditches. The defendant McQueen had a contract for drilling a well for the supply of water for this sanitarium, and Fonda frequently loaned men to him and sometimes McQueen loaned men to Fonda. Fonda had nothing to do with the well…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, on authority of Matter of De Noyer v. Cavanaugh (221 N. Y. 273); no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cayll v. Waukesha Gas & Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Bird v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Claim of Mandatto v. Hudson Shoring Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Bruce R. Raines Associates, Inc. v. Whitman & RansomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988