Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 8, 1999No. 73, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The sole question presented by this case is whether a trial court’s closure of a courtroom during the testimony of a 14-year-old victim of sexual abuse, without making a case-specific finding of fact on the record demonstrating a sufficient basis for the action, violates the accused’s Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. In an unreported opinion, the Court of Special Appeals concluded that, under the facts of this case, the trial court’s actions did not violate the accused’s right to a public trial. We shall reverse.

I

The petitioner, Robert Ciana Carter, was charged in a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Tharp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Markham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Longus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Admin. Off. of the Courts v. Abell Fnd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API