Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. White

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

At a former term this case was affirmed without considering the assignments of error for the reason that same did not comply with rules 24 and 25 (142 S. W. xii), recently promulgated by the Supreme Court for the government of the Courts of Civil Appeals. Subsequent to the affirmance of the case the Supreme Court held the rules so promulgated to be in violation of articles 2061 and 2062, Revised Statutes 1911, in requiring litigants to set out in a motion for new trial alleged error in giving or refusing charges or other action of the trial court appearing of record. Missouri, Kansas & Texas…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BeasleyTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Benton v. KutykendallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. St. Louis & S. F. R. v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas Midland R. R. v. FoglemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Texas Midland R. R. v. Becker & ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Dean v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API