Legal Opinion

Certain Martinsville Annexation Territory Landowners v. City of Martinsville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 2014No. 55A01-1402-MI-64PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

The Appellants are remonstrators (“the Remonstrators”) who appeal the trial court’s order denying their remonstrance, affirming the City of Martinsville’s (“the City”) annexation ordinance, and approving the annexation of certain land surrounding the City. The Remonstrators raise several issues on appeal; however, we find the following issue dispositive: whether the appeal should be dismissed as moot because the annexation has become final, and there is no effective relief that this court can render to the Remon-strators.

We dismiss.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 19,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bradley v. City of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Perry Township v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Rogers v. Municipal City of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. DeSalle v. GentryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, L.L.C. v. City of New HavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc., Sierra Club, Inc., and Valley Watch, Inc. v. Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Co. d/b/a Vectren Energy Delivery of Indiana, Inc., Ind. Utility RegulatoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API