Legal Opinion
Hasegawa v. Maui Pineapple Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1970No. 4936PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LEVINSON, J.
This case involves the constitutionality, under both the Hawaii and United States Constitutions, of HRS § 388-32 which requires that every employer who employs more than 25 persons. . . shall pay to each of his employees who serves on a jury or a public board compensation in an amount equal to the difference between the remuneration the employee receives for such service.on a jury or a public board and the wages and any other remuneration he would have received from his employer had he not served on the jury or public board.
The appellant, Maui Pineapple Co.,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. KantnerHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- Alco Parking Corp. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Washington v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BakerHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.