Legal Opinion
United States v. Ray Nedley, Stanley Jochim, and Paul Baurhenn
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 14, 1958No. 12366-12368PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Has the Hobbs Act 1 raised hob with centuries-old concepts of the crime of “robbery” to such extent that to establish its commission the Government need no longer prove (1) a specific intent to steal and to permanently deprive the owner or possessor of his property; (2) a “taking” and (3) a “carrying away”?
Otherwise stated: Is mere unlawful interference, by force, violence and/or putting in fear, with the dominion and control being exercised by the operator of a Vehicle, with resulting obstruction or delay in the movement of articles or commodities in interstate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People v. KoerberNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- People v. LevanNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. AddonizioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Anthony ProvenzanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Melgar-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Ernesto CarmonaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.