UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John KELLY III, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
John Kelly appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 2255. We review the denial of a § 2255 motion de novo, Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.1994), and we reverse and remand.
In his motion, Kelly claimed that his 1992 conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm should be invalidated because his right to possess a firearm was restored in 1989, after he completed his Colorado prison sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20). Although the government conceded that the conviction should be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jonah Iaea v. Franklin Sunn, Director of the Department of Social Services, State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Daniel Eugene Frazer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Karen Sue Morris v. State of California Ventura County Municipal Court Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Horace Henry MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BaramdykaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Adrian Parra Cazares, United States of America v. Francisco Alvarez-Sanchez, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BaramdykaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Hernandez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002