Legal Opinion
Akerman Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A. v. Value Seafood, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 4, 2013No. 3D12-1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLagoa, J.
Akerman Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A. (“Akerman”), as Assignee of Procesadora de Alimentos Infal, S.A. (“Infal”), appeals from an amended order dismissing garnishment writs issued against Kristinn V. Blondal (“Blondal”) and Cache Medical Connections, Inc. (“Cache”) (collectively, “Garnishees”). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm in part and reverse in part with instructions on remand.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In October 2009, Infal obtained a money judgment against Value Seafood, Inc., in the amount of $91,367.58. Infal assigned this money judgment to Akerman in June 2010. On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Continental Cas. Co. v. Ryan Inc. EasternSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- City of Miami Beach v. GalbutSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Williams v. Espirito Santo Bank of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Gigliotti Contracting North, Inc. v. TRAFFIC CONTROL PRO. OF NORTH FLORIDA, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Regions Bank v. HymanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Kane v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- City of Delray Beach v. DesistoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Eduartez v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Eduartez v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.