Insurance Co. of North America v. DeLoach & Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action upon insurance policy, from city court of Reidsville— Judge Morgan. August 34, 1907'.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
Suit was brought upon an insurance policy in the sum of $1,300, written by the defendant company on the plaintiffs’ stock of goods. The policy contained the usual clause making it void in the event that additional insurance, whether already existing or thereafter to be procured,'should be taken without the written consent of the company. Upon the policy is indorsed the following entry: “$500 additional concurrent insurance permitted.” At the date that this policy was issued, the insured had in force-two policies of the iEtna Insurance Company, amounting to $3,000, on the same stock of goods.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wellmaker v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- North British & Mercantile Insurance v. TyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- In Re the New York Protestant Episcopal Public SchoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Fair v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Finleyson Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- B. L. Ivey Construction Co. v. Pilot Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.