Maxfield v. Schwartz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Sco'tt county, Edson, J., presiding, overruling their demurrer to the complaint. The action was brought to recover $287.81, on the agreement of defendants stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanderburgh, J.1
The complaint shows that on the 19th day of July, 1889, and for a long time prior thereto, the firm of Berens & Nachtsheim were engaged in business as general merchants in the city of Shakopee, and owned a stock of goods and merchandise, book-accounts, claims, and demands, and at that date entered into an agreement in writing with the defendants in this action, whereby they agreed to sell and deliver to the defendants all the property of every kind then belonging to them, and the defendants agreed, as consideration for such purchase, to pay the sum of $5,071, and did also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bassett v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Barlow v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Snell v. IvesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Sullivan v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maxfield v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Malanaphy v. Fuller & Johnson Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Bell v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Wood v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.