Legal Opinion
Pateman v. Marra
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Nicholas Colabella, J.
In a CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioners seek to annul the determination of respondents to postpone consideration of septic and subdivision approval pursuant to a moratorium on development.
background
A local moratorium was enacted September 1, 1986, regulat*808ing, for an interim period, the issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the consideration and approval of subdivision plats and site plans in the Village of Irvington. As relevant here, this ordinance prohibited the subdivision of any parcel of property comprising more…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pokoik v. SilsdorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Dune Associates, Inc. v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Triangle Inn, Inc. v. Lo GrandeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Hatcher v. Planning Board of NelsonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Huntington Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. Town of SouthamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howeth Investments, Inc. v. City of Hedwig Village, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- 9th & 10th Street L.L.C. v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007