Legal Opinion

9th & 10th Street L.L.C. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Catterson, J.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, the Department of Buildings’ (DOB) denial of a building permit to the petitioner on the grounds that petitioner could not produce documentation of eventual institutional control over a proposed dormitory building constituted an impermissible administrative anticipatory punishment.

On July 20, 1998, the petitioner acquired block 392, lot 10 (known both as 605 East 9th Street and as 350 East 10th Street) from the City of New York through public auction for $3,150,000. The deed contains the following restriction: “Use and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York Botanical Garden v. Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Baskin v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Baskin v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Di Milia v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Association of Friends of Sagaponack v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 9th & 10th Street v. Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. MTR OF 9TH & 10TH ST v. BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API