Legal Opinion
Provident Energy Associates v. Bullington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 2003No. 02-35798; D.C. No. CV-01-00055-SEHPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM*
Provident Energy Associates (“Provident”) brought this suit for declaratory judgment against Foy Wallace Bullington, O.O. Thompson, and Murphy Phillips, individually and as executor of the Estate of Ford Fullingim (“Bullington Parties”), requesting a declaration that Provident owns the Two Medicine Cut Bank Sand Unit (“TMCBSU”) and all the revenue and royalties produced therefrom, and that the Bullington Parties had no rights to or interest in either Provident or any of its assets (including the TMCBSU). The district court granted summary judgment to Provident on the basis of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sicor Ltd. v. Cetus Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Pramco, LLC Ex Rel. CFSC Consortium, LLC v. San Juan Bay Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Chao v. Westside Drywall, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- CONNECTU LLC v. ZuckerbergDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Blanchard v. WAL-MART STORES, TEXAS, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.