Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wright v. Clausen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 11, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Ratliff

— Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. The facts in the present ease are substantially the same as in the former one as set out in that opinion, 253 Ky. 498, 69 S. W. (2d) 1062, 1064, and it is not necessary to repeat them in this opinion. The case was reversed on. the former appeal because of erroneous instructions, and in that opinion the court indicated the proper instructions to be given on another trial on issues where the evidence is substantially the same. In the former opinion we said:

“And there was some proof this collision occurred on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Utilities Appliance Co. v. Toon's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Challinor v. AxtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Wright v. ClausenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Jellico Grocery Company v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hinton v. Dixie Ohio Exp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  2. Rodgers v. StollerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Siler v. WillifordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  4. Jewell v. OglesbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  5. Vansant v. Holbrook's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API