Legal Opinion
Zampino v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelix J. Aulisi, J.
This action is for breach of warranty. Plaintiff Helen M. Zampino, on August 10,1954, accompanied by her husband, coplaintiff, Michael Zampino, entered the defendant’s F. W. Woolworth department store, in the city of Albany and said to a saleslady, “I want to buy a good underarm deodorant; which one would you recommend for me to buy? ” The answer was, “ Veto is the best ”. Mrs. Zampino then looked at the counter which displayed the deodorant in question, picked up a jar of Veto which was still in its original package and handed it to the saleslady. Mrs. Zampino paid for the Veto and then left…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
- Kelvinator Sales Corp. v. Quabbin Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parish v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- Malul v. Capital Cabinets, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002