People v. Sandore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the trial court erred by refusing to strike the testimony of a police investigator who destroyed Rosario material. Police Investigator Pieklik interviewed defendant shortly after his arrest, made notes of the interview and prepared a written report based, in part, upon those notes. Thereafter, the investigator destroyed his notes.
Clearly, "a right sense of justice” entitles a defendant to inspect the prior statements of a prosecution witness relating to the subject matter of that witness’s testimony prior to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MalinskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. QuilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993