Legal Opinion

Bottiglieri v. Caldarone

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 24, 1985No. 83-180-Appeal, 83-220-AppealPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEVILACQUA, Chief Justice.

These two separate cases have been consolidated on appeal. In each case the employee brought a petition seeking benefits from the Second Injury Indemnity Fund pursuant to G.L.1956 (1979 Reenactment) § 28-37-1. 1 The trial commissioner denied and dismissed the petitions. The Workers’ Compensation Commission (hereinafter the commission) affirmed, holding that since neither employee was totally incapacitated, both fell outside the scope of the Second Injury Fund statute. The employees appeal from the decrees of the commission.

Cox v. Caldarone

On January 14, 1974,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fiske v. MacGregor, Division of BrunswickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  2. Moretti v. Turin, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  3. Healy v. DeSanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. PunielloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelly v. MarcantonioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Hicks v. Vennerbeck & Clase Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  3. Thomas v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency FundSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. Verte v. Mearthane Products Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. The Diocese of Providence v. VazSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API