Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Mott

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Summers County. Action by S. B. Tbomas against J. J. Mott. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, Judge:

■ Plaintiff sued in assumpsit to recover compensation in damages, measured by the value of seven shares of the corporate stock of the Dominion Power Company of Virginia. The declaration contained only the indebitatus assumpsit counts for work and labor, goods bargained and sold, money lent, paid and expended, had and received, and account stated. Of a judgment for plaintiff defendant complains on writ of error.

The declaration being sufficient in form, the demurrer thereto properly was overruled. The meritorious assignment questions the right to recover on the common counts, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lipscomb's Adm'r v. CondonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Mankin v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Sandusky v. Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Luella Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Mattocks v. LymanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. Standard Ultramarine and Color Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. FielderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Minotti v. YoungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Standard Fashion Co. v. LopinskyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Campbell v. Kanawha & Hocking Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API