De Witte v. Kearney & Trecker Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
We will first consider the question whether the complaint states the facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In deciding this point it must be determined, first, whether the words used and the statements made are capable of the libelous meaning, and, second, whether such statements refer to some ascertained or ascertainable person.
Paragraphs “Fourth,” “Fifth,” and “Sixth” of the letter, which are particularly referred to in the complaint, contain the language “misconduct of the small group of officers of the EIU;” statements that such officers “misrepresented” the purpose of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Judevine v. Benzies-Montanye Fuel & Warehouse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Arnold v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Scofield v. Milwaukee Free Press Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Noonan v. OrtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Kassowitz v. Sentinel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lathan v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Frinzi v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Poorbaugh v. MullenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Whaling v. Stone Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Smith v. UAW-CIO Federal Credit UnionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.