Legal Opinion

Harmand v. Harmand

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 23, 2005No. 2040365Published

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWLEY, Presiding Judge.

The parties were divorced in April 1995, after a 30-year marriage. At the time of the divorce, John William Harmand (“the husband”) was a civil-service employee of the United States government covered by the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (“FERS”). Arlene Margo Harmand (“the wife”) had no retirement benefits. The final judgment of divorce incorporated the parties’ settlement agreement. Paragraph 10 of the divorce judgment states:

“10. The [wife] shall receive as her separate property, an interest equal to one-half (½) of the value of the [husband’s] retirement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API