Legal Opinion

Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity v. Baker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 12, 1995No. 1930811PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether the admission of the defendant Pi Kappa Phi's "Fraternity Insurance Purchasing Group Risk Management Manual" and references to it were probative and relevant, or whether they improperly interjected the fact that the fraternity had liability insurance so that a reversal of the judgment is warranted. We apply the general rule of evidence that in an action based on injury to a person or damage to property, proof may not be made that the defendant was insured against liability.

The plaintiff, Scott Allen Baker, had been invited by the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Prescott v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Robins Engineering, Inc. v. CockrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Thorne v. ParrishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lance, Inc. v. RamanauskasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API