Nordahl v. Erickson
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentCarter, J.
I do not agree that the record in this case sustains a finding that plaintiff was totally and permanently dis*212abled. The case involves schedule injuries and other claimed injuries to other members, and a further contention of permanent injury to the body as a whole.
We have few cases in this state in which the relation of a schedule injury to injury to the body as a whole has been considered. The opinion of the majority appears deficient in the consideration of this problem.
The plaintiff sustained an injury to his right foot which, standing alone, would be compensated for as a schedule injury…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashton v. Blue River Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
- Johnson v. David Cole Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Frost v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Bronson v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Paulson v. Glenn L. Martin-Nebraska Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.