Legal Opinion

United States v. Saenz-Forero

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 20, 1994No. 93-03556PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-appellant Hernando Saenz-Forero pleaded guilty on February 3,1993 to illegally attempting to re-enter the United States after having been previously arrested and deported. 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 1 He appeals his 41-month sentence, claiming (1) that the trial court violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution by using a 1985 conviction to enhance his sentence; and (2) that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no basis for reversal or modification of Saenz-Forero’s sentence, we AFFIRM.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On December…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. CalverleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Jimmy Lee Rasco Marcus A. MiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Chavez-ValenciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Cabrera-SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API