Legal Opinion

BELL v. O'REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES LLC

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 15, 2022No. 1:16-cv-00501Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRIAN BELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:16-cv-00501-JDL ) O’REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, ) LLC, d/b/a O’REILLY AUTO ) PARTS, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REDUCE THE JURY’S VERDICT At the October 2021 trial, the jury found that Defendant O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC (“O’Reilly Auto”) had failed to reasonably accommodate Plaintiff Brian Bell as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Maine Human Rights Act (“MHRA”). The jury awarded Bell $42,000 in back pay and $75,000 in compensatory damages. The jury then…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davignon v. ClemmeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Kai Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  3. Knapp Shoes, Inc. v. Sylvania Shoe Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Alvan H. Wolf v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API