Legal Opinion

In Re Mundy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 22, 1942No. 36923PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The relator, who is an attorney at law, is applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus to compel the judges of the civil district court to permit him to practice before the court without paying the $5 annual dues assessed by the Louisiana State-Bar Association. Two of the judges before whom he appeared as an attorney in certain judicial proceedings in the civil district court informed him in open court that his name was on the delinquent list furnished to the court by the Bar Association, and that he would not be permitted to practice before the court unless he would first reinstate himself…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Integration of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ex Parte StecklerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  4. State v. WaplesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Louisiana State Bar Association v. EdwinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  4. Lathrop v. DonohueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In re Rodríguez TorresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API