Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Steckler
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 26, 1934No. 32769PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
Two graduates of a law school are applying to be licensed to practice law, without having to pass the examination prescribed by the Supreme Court Examining Committee, as required by Act No. 113 of 1924, and by rule 15 of the Supreme Court Rules (171 La. xiv), fixing the requirements for admission to the bar. The petitioners contend that the statute and the rule of the court are unconstitutional in denying the right of a holder of the degree of Bachelor of Laws from Tulane University to practice law without further examination. The degree of Bachelor of Laws was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Meunier v. BernichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. MurrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Succession of WallaceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.