Legal Opinion

Crofton Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 2010No. 32 September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBERA, Judge.

In this case we decide whether, under the Code of Maryland Regulations (“COMAR”) 10.09.10.10,1 a Medicaid provider that made payments pursuant to an interest rate swap agreement *205can claim reimbursement of those payments as mortgage interest.

The petitioner, Crofton Convalescent Center (“Crofton”), is a nursing facility certified to provide medical care through the Maryland Medical Assistance Program (“Medicaid”). In 1998, Crofton entered into a financing arrangement that, through the use of an interest rate swap agreement, exchanged the variable interest rate on Crofton’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Thrifty Oil Co. v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Schreyer v. ChaplainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Thanner Enterprises, LLC v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Carven v. State Retirement & Pension SystemCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Balt. City Detention Ctr. v. FoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Hranicka v. Chesapeake Surgical, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API