Legal Opinion
Rajala v. Hodes (In Re Hodes)
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 13, 2003No. Bankruptcy Nos. 98-20039-7-I-JAR, 98-20040-7-I-JAR, Civil Action Nos. 99-2536-GTV, 99-2537-GTVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VANBEBBER, Chief Judge.
This Memorandum and Order addresses the bankruptcy appeals in Civil Action Numbers 99-2536-GTV and 99-2537-GTV. Appellant, Trustee Eric Rajala, appeals three orders from the United States Bankruptcy Court, dated April 19, 1999, August 18, 1999, and November 5, 1999, regarding the attorney fees of Appellees Stanford Zeldin and Cynthia Grimes, both of whom acted as counsel for Appellees/Debtors Barbara and Phillip Hodes. The court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) and affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands for further…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wagers v. Lentz & Clark, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Redmond v. Lentz & Clark, P.A. (In Re Wagers)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Redmond v. Lentz & Clark, P.A. (In Re Wagers)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Brandon Humberto Estanol and Alexandria Paige EstanolUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2025