Legal Opinion
Murray v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided June 21, 2004No. Motion No. M-67997Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael E. Hudson, J.
*399This application for leave to file and serve a late claim compels a review of inconsistent determinations regarding the applicability of the late claim remedies set forth within Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) to inmate personal property claims, which are governed by Court of Claims Act § 10 (9). For reasons that follow I believe that the provisions of section 10 (6) do not apply to claims under section 10 (9), and will deny such discretionary relief without considering the underlying merits of the application.
Claimant, an inmate in the custody of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Enright v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Union Carbide Marble Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- First Energy Leasing Corp. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re the Accounting of FraserNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Citibank, N. A. v. City of New York Finance AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.