Frederick v. Nuzum
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Beadle County. Hon. At,va E. Taylor, Judge. Action toy E. E. Erederick, agiainst M. L. Nuzum and others, for foreclosure of a mortgage. Enotm a judgment against plaintiff, and from¡ an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. (i) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: 4 Cyc. 569; 20 Cyc. 1022; Association v. Heir, (Neb.) 72 N. W. 588; Sturdlevant v. Bolin Sash & Door Cd., 78 N. W. 265; Straw v. Jenks, 43 N. W. 941 (Dak.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Beadle County. Hon. At,va E. Taylor, Judge. Action toy E. E. Erederick, agiainst M. L. Nuzum and others, for foreclosure of a mortgage. Enotm a judgment against plaintiff, and from¡ an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. (i) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: 4 Cyc. 569; 20 Cyc. 1022; Association v. Heir, (Neb.) 72 N. W. 588; Sturdlevant v. Bolin Sash & Door Cd., 78 N. W. 265; Straw v. Jenks, 43 N. W. 941 (Dak. Ter.) ; Strong v. Brown, (Minn.) 53 N. W. 67. Respondent's Nuzum cited: Code Civ. Proc., Secs. 98, 336. (3) T01 point three of t'he…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.
Tihe defendants Nuzums, as mortgagors, in September, 1909, executed and delivered! to. one Robert Frederick, as mortgagee, .a mortgage upon certain lands in Beadle county, to secure the payment of a note for $2,319, ¡and interest. On the 16th day of October, 1911, it is alleged ¡that ¡said note and mortgage were assigned by ¡said Robert Frederick to his son, E. E. Frederick, die plaintiff in this action. Alleging- that default existed ini the payment of said ¡indebtedness iso secured by said mortgage, ¡the plaintiff instituted ¡this action to foreclose said mortgage against said mortgagors,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hutcheson v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Black Hills Brewing Co. v. Middle West Fire InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heimes v. HeimesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Heimes v. HeimesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946