Legal Opinion

Bergstrom v. Motor Vehicles Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 24, 1990No. 88-12-40; CA A60276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Respondent’s driver’s license was suspended, because he refused to submit to a breath test. ORS 813.410(1). He requested a hearing, and the Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) upheld the suspension. On review of the hearings officer’s decision under ORS 813.410(7), the circuit court vacated the suspension because it concluded that respondent had not refused to take the test. We reverse.

The facts are not disputed. Respondent was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. While he and the officer were at the scene of the arrest, respondent told the officer that he would not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. STATE, MOTOR VEHICLES DIV., ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wimmer v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. SuazoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Caldeira v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. KirschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API