Legal Opinion
Pitts v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 6, 1982No. F-81-370, F-81-371PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Judge:
Appellants were charged conjointly with Robbery With a Dangerous Weapon, in Case Number CRF-80-2024, in the District Court of Tulsa County. At the preliminary hearing, appellants’ motion to suppress was sustained and the State gave timely notice of intent to appeal the ruling pursuant to Rule Six, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 22 O.S., ch. 18, App.Rule 6 et seq. On the State’s appeal, the ruling of the magistrate was reversed by the Honorable Jay Dalton, District Judge, and the cause remanded for further preliminary hearing.
When the preliminary hearing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Hay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
- Swain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- People v. NorrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Diaz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.