Legal Opinion

People v. Dad

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1921No. Crim. No. 537PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

From the judgment following the verdict of conviction of murder in the first degree, with penalty fixed at life imprisonment, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant brings this appeal. It is not disputed that at the time and place alleged in the indictment defendant shot to death two of his countrymen, including one Said Achmed, whose murder was charged in the present proceeding. There can be no doubt that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, and that the finding of the jury represents a fair and reasonable inference from the facts and circumstances…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ConboyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. In Re BlackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. SwainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API