Legal Opinion
E. Gluck Corp. v. Rothenhaus
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 3, 2008No. 08 Civ. 3466(VM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff E. Gluck Corporation (“Gluck”) brought this action alleging that defendant Adam Rothenhaus (“Rothenhaus”): (1) infringed its NOW trademark (“NOW”) in violation of Section 32 of the Lanham Act (the “Lanham Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1); (2) engaged in cyberpiracy by maintaining the domain name www.thenowwatch.com (the “Domain Name”) in violation of Section 43(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d); and (3) engaged in unfair competition in violation of Section 43 of the Lanham Act, § 1125(a). Among other relief, Gluck seeks: to restrain…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Lloyd E. Boddie v. Officer B. Schnieder Officer D. Dewald Officer P. Robertson Sergeant K. Schmitt and Hearing Officer Mr. PicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- New York City Triathlon, LLC v. Nyc Triathlon Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- CFE Racing Products, Inc. v. BMF Wheels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Holdings v. New York Post Publishing Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- JA Apparel Corp. v. AbboudDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. TenenbaumDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.