Legal Opinion
Mosley v. Pennzoil Quaker State
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 2005No. 39,981-WCAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
I!WILLIAMS, Judge.
The claimant, John Mosley, Sr., appeals a judgment in favor of the employer, Pennzoil Quaker State Company, finding that claimant was not entitled to supplemental earnings benefits (SEB) because a job within his physical capabilities was available. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS
In a prior appeal involving these parties, Mosley v. Pennzoil Quaker State, 37,199 (La.App. 2d Cir.7/23/03), 850 So.2d 1100, this court described the factual and procedural background of this case as follows:
On or about April 10, 1995, the claimant, John Mosley, Sr., injured his lower back…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Freeman v. Poulan/Weed EaterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Mosley v. Pennzoil Quaker StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brantley v. Delta Ridge Implement, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006