Gleim v. Harris
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 155, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Cumberland Co., refusing to take off nonsuit. Trespass for death of plaintiff’s husband. At the trial the court entered a compulsory nonsuit, which it subsequently refused to take off. Biddle, P. J., filed the following opinion by which the facts appear.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 155, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Cumberland Co., refusing to take off nonsuit. Trespass for death of plaintiff’s husband. At the trial the court entered a compulsory nonsuit, which it subsequently refused to take off. Biddle, P. J., filed the following opinion by which the facts appear. About 6 o’clock in the morning of December 10,1895, Michael Gleim, the husband of plaintiff, started from home with four horses hitched in a large country wagon for the purpose of getting a load of wood at the mountain. In the southern end of the borough of Mount Holly…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ceeiam,
We are not convinced that there is any error in this record.
The judgment denying the motion to take off the nonsuit is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president of the common pleas.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Dryden v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Borofsky v. West Jersey & Seashore R. R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Succession of HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1917
- Wojochoski v. Central RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899