Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hafner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1926No. Appeal 4PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Pouter, P. J.,

This defendant was charged, in two separate indictments, (1) with operating an automobile while under the influence of liquor and (2) with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. The two indictments were, by consent, tried at the same time before the same jury. The jury returned their verdicts in‘open court finding, in the case from which we have this appeal, the defendant “guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor” and finding the defendant not guilty in the case in which he was charged with violation of the liquor law.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MicusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Commonwealth v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Commonwealth v. HustonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Thompson v. Emerald Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HomeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Commonwealth v. TroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. GrabAdams County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1945
  4. Commonwealth v. McDanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. Landis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API