Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Unit Crane & Shovel Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1970PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

This is a products liability case.

Plaintiff’s intestate was killed by the collapse of the boom of a crane manufactured by defendant. Plaintiff brought this action for wrongful death both on the theory of negligence and strict liability. The case was tried without a jury, and the court found for plaintiff on both theories. Defendant appeals and its assignments of error are that there was no evidence to substantiate the court’s findings.

Defendant’s principal contention is that the crane was old and the collapse was caused by the deterioration of age. The crane was built in 1956 and used from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jakubowski v. Minnesota Mining and ManufacturingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Courtois v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Balido v. Improved MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Farmer v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Tillman v. Vance Equipment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Quirk v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. McGrath v. White Motor CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API