Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 10, 1964No. [App. No. 155, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.

The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County committed the applicant to the Patuxent Institution after a jury found him to be a defective delinquent. The State’s case was presented through Dr. Boslow, who is a psychiatrist and is the director of Patuxent. While there is no transcript of the testimony in the record before us, it does contain the report of the Patuxent staff, which relates the applicant’s criminal and other history and concludes that he is a defective delinquent. The record indicates that Dr. Boslow informed the jury of the contents of the staff report and testified in support of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Queen v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Crisp v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Sansbury v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Naill v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API