Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Eastman v. School Dist. No. 1

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1947No. 8700Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Angstman

(specially concurring).

In agreeing with the opinion of Mr. Justice Choate I feel impelled to state the reasons why I cannot subscribe to the conclusions in the dissenting opinions of Mr. Chief Justice Adair and Mr. Justice Metcalf.

1 will say at the outset that were I in doubt on the subject I would be inclined to resolve such doubt in favor of Miss Eastman. If the statute were open to two constructions I would adopt the one most favorable to Miss Eastman. If the statute were ambiguous I would resolve the ambiguities in her favor. The difficulty here is that the statute is plain and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hilger v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. State Ex Rel. Palagi v. ReganMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People ex rel. Fursman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State Ex Rel. Jones v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API