Legal Opinion

Albertsen v. Swift & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1924No. 25,888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This appeal involves a phase of the workmen’s compensation law. Chris Albertsen, a carpenter employed by Swift & Company, was injured in the service of the defendant. It is conceded by the defendant that he was entitled to some compensation under the act, and by agreement of the parties it was stipulated that the claim should be settled by arbitration. The stipulation was:

“That Charles A. Blair shall have the power not only to fix the amount of compensation, if any, but to find the character and quality of the disability, if any, and to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roper v. HammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Kinzer v. Wyandotte County Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Potocan v. Hamilton Coal & Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Brewer v. Vinegar Hill Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Lefebvre v. Western Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Welden v. Edgar Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Edwards v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API