Legal Opinion

Parker v. Shecut

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 7, 2004No. 25835PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

Anne S. Parker appeals the master-in-equity’s findings on remand concerning, among other things, calculation of damages for ouster and attorney’s fees and interest awards. This appeal was certified from the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm.

Factual/Procedural Background

Since 1995, Anne S. Parker (Anne) and her brothers, Marion A. Shecut, III (Bo) and Winfield W. Shecut (Win), have been involved in litigation concerning property bequeathed to them by their mother. The litigation began when Anne sued her brothers, seeking to partition the estate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Muller v. Myrtle Beach Golf & Yacht ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Woods v. BivensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Parker v. ShecutSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whippie v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API