Legal Opinion

Baum v. North River Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakkson, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant made motion in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below allowed the motion, and in this we think there was error.

The evidence was to the effect that the plaintiff was the owner of a ferry boat, “Rebecca.” After some correspondence with agents of the defendant company, in which plaintiff stated that no gasoline would be used thereon, and that it was a crude oil boat, a policy of insurance in the amount of $3,500 was issued plaintiff for a period of one year, from 6 July, 1926, upon the payment of $105…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grabbs v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Underwood v. State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. McClure v. Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Allgood v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Poole v. Imperial Mutual Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Underwood v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Cab Co. v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Blue Bird Cab Co. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Insurance Co v. . Harrison-Wright Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Standard Accident Insurance v. Harrison-Wright Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API