Legal Opinion

Dye v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1943No. 14466PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. Where judgments overruling general demurrers to a petition are unexcepted to, they become the law of the case; and where, as here, the plaintiff proves the allegations of such a petition for damages and attorney's fees, he is entitled to recover. The evidence supported the verdict for the plaintiff for attorney's fees, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.

2. Rulings on pleadings and interlocutory judgments, when preserved by exceptions pendente lite, may be reviewed by the Supreme Court when error is assigned thereon in the final bill of exceptions; but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Hall v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. O'Neal v. SpiveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Brooks v. RawlingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morris v. Transtates Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Bregman v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Courtney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API