Dye v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following his conviction by a jury of armed robbery and the denial of his motion for new trial, Richard C. Dye appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, and that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1. Dye contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.

As an appellate court, we do not weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses or resolve conflicts in trial testimony when the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged. Instead, we determine…