Legal Opinion

Rigg v. Bias

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Kingman District Court. Action to recover the value of certain corn. Judgment for the plaintiff Bias, at the September term, 1887, for $80. The defendants bring the case to this court. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action in the court below by Oliver Bias against C. T. Rigg, sheriff of Barber county, and the sureties upon his official bond, to recover the value of four hundred bushels of corn levied upon and sold under execution. Bias alleged that the corn was exempt from seizure and sale, being necessary for the support of himself, family, and his stock for one year.

After the introduction of the evidence, the charge of the *149court, and the arguments of the attorneys, the jury retired for deliberation in charge of the bailiff. This was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MuglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Young v. SeymourNebraska Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mattice v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Volkman v. WaltermathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Martinez v. ValdesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API