Legal Opinion
Stark v. Photo Researchers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 3, 1977No. 76 Civ. 5306PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.
The defendant has moved pursuant to Rule 37(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order compelling the plaintiff to produce documents sought in discovery. After careful consideration of the plaintiff’s objections, we direct that-plaintiff comply with the defendant’s requests for production of documents as modified by this decision.
*20The plaintiff, a professional artist and photographer, deposited with the defendant a large quantity of 35 mm transparencies (“slides”) on August 11, 1969. (See plaintiff’s Memorandum dated July 19, 1977, p.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Wamsley v. . Atlas Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Sarkesian v. Cedric Chase Photographic Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Crowe v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
- MacGregor v. WattsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Culligan v. Yamaha Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Goss v. CrossleyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
- Pollock v. Deere and Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979