Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Jorgenson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1961No. 35687Published

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Defendants limit their appeal to a single issue: Did the trial court err when it entered final judgment instead of granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the action for want of prosecution, pursuant to Rule of Pleading, Practice and Procedure 41.04W, RCW Vol. 0? Specifically, the question is whether Rule 41.04W applies to the period after trial between the court’s memorandum decision and the entry of final judgment.

Issues of law and fact, joined by the complaint, answer, and reply, were noted for hearing and tried to the court December 18, 1957. May 9, 1958, the court issued its memorandum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Goodnow v. O'PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Caldwell v. CaldwellWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kelly v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. McDowell v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API